Services @ Dexterity Portal

Today

June 2019
S M T W T F S
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
Categories: CareersNews

Compulsory retirement: Court orders reinstatement of Maj.-Gen. Ijioma

Advertisements

The National Industrial Court, Abuja, on Monday ordered the reinstatement of Maj.-Gen. Ijioma Nwokoro Ijioma in the Nigerian Army.

Ijioma was one of the 38 officers of the Nigerian Army retired in June, 2016.

Delivering judgment, Justice Edith Agbakoba, held that there was evidence that due process was not followed in the compulsory retirement of the claimant.

She held that he was not informed about his offence and neither was he tried before a court marshal for any offence before his compulsory retirement.

Agbakoba also held that the claimant was not accorded fair hearing by not giving him opportunity to defend himself.

She, therefore, declared that the compulsory retirement was wrongful, illegal, null, void and of no effect.

She also declared that the claimant was still a staff of the Nigerian Army.

The judge further set aside the letter of the compulsory retirement dated June 9, 2016.

Agbakoba also ordered reinstatement of the claimant to his position with payment of all entitlements and privileges accrued to him.

The judge equally directed that the defendants, their agents were restrained from stopping, interfering or victimising the claimant.

She concluded by awarding the sum of N200,000 in favour of the claimant as cost of prosecuting the suit.

Joined in the suit as co-defendants were the Chief of Army Staff, Minister of Defence and Chief of Defence Staff.

The General approached the court, seeking redress and several reliefs amongst which was reinstatement, stating that his compulsory retirement did not follow due process and procedure as stipulated by the Armed Forces Act for an officer of his status.

He argued that because his retirement did not follow due process, he consequently sought for court declaration to declare it as illegal, invalid, wrongful, unlawful, unconstitutional, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

He also prayed that the court compel the defendants jointly and severally to pay him the sum of N1 billion as general, aggravated, punitive and exemplary damages for the unlawful, wrongful, illegal, unconstitutional and oppressive compulsory retirement.

The N1 billion, he argued was also for the attendant humiliation, psychological trauma, mental agony and odium caused him and his family, by the actions of the defendants.

Counsel for the first and fourth defendants, Dare Owolabi had earlier before the judgment accused the court’s staff of bias in their dealings with him.

Counsel to the claimant, Godwin Iyinbor said there was no justifiable reason for the claimant’s early compulsory retirement as he had not attained the mandatory retirement age nor had he served the army for 35 years as stipulated in the Army.

Iyinbor said the retirement age for Major Generals was 56 years and the claimant was only 53 years as at the time of the retirement, and had only served for 32 years, 11 months and five days, as against the mandatory 35 years service age for retirement as provided for by Rule 020810 of the Federal Government Public Service Rules, which is also applicable to the Military.

 

Ijioma, in his statement of claims, stated that on June 10, 2016, while at work, he got a text message from one Lt.-Col. S.O.G. Aremu, Staff Officer to the Military Secretary in charge of recruitment, deployment, appointment informing him that the Army Council, which sat on June 9, 2016, had retired him.

He said he later got anothe letter that the Army Council at its meeting of June 9, 2016, approving his compulsory retirement from the Nigerian Army, with effect from June 9, 2016, pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 09.02c(4) of the Harmonized Terms and Conditions of Service.

He said the compulsory according to the letter was done on disciplinary ground bordering on serious offence.

Ijioma further said meanwhile, no proceeding was held to try him, no verdict given, no record of proceedings was compiled and transmitted, with the verdict to Army Council, for ratification.

The claimant claimed further that he was never given any charge in the prescribed Form AB 252, which was the means of reporting an offence against service personnel.

Ogugua

Recent Posts

Air Peace Promises 50,000 Jobs As It Launches MRO Facilities

Air Peace announced the job opportunities as It begins construction of MRO Facilities West and…

3 weeks ago

Aliko Dangote plans towards another multi-billion dollar project outside manufacturing

Aliko Dangote plans to integrate electric trucks into the Dangote Group’s fleet Aliko Dangote, Africa's…

3 weeks ago

One Man Registered 5 Businesses Within 48Hours, Secures Inflated N3.4Bn Nigerian Police Contracts

According to the investigation, five businesses — Akulight Technologies Limited, Mag-Tram Systems Limited, Drip-CHS Tech…

1 month ago

Anambra State Independent Power Generating Company Limited: Tomorrows Power Today

Anambra State Independent Power Generating Company Limited In Concept While an "Anambra State Independent Power…

2 months ago

Israel’s strikes on Gaza Killed Five journalists, 15 others

Israel's strikes on Gaza hospital Israel's strikes on Gaza hospital in southern Gaza killed no fewer than…

2 months ago

HEDA Gives AGF 14 Days To Reinstate Criminal Charges Against Ex-AMCON Boss, Ahmed Kuru

On August 12, 2025, it was reported that Hon. Justice Rahman Oshodi of the Lagos…

2 months ago