Services @ Dexterity Portal

Today

April 2026
S M T W T F S
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
Categories: News

Lawyer Declares Nnamdi Kanu’s Prosecution Unlawful, Criticizes Nigerian Govt

Advertisements

He described any attempt to prosecute Kanu under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 as legally indefensible, procedurally improper, and morally unjustifiable

Human rights lawyer, Barr. Christopher Chidera, has criticised the Nigerian government’s decision to restart the prosecution of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), from scratch (de novo).

He described any attempt to prosecute Kanu under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 as legally indefensible, procedurally improper, and morally unjustifiable.

Chidera urged Tinubu’s administration to promptly engage in peaceful negotiations to resolve the matter amicably before midnight on Thursday, 20 March 2025. He warned that failure to do so could lead to the exposure of high-profile corruption, systemic failures, and injustices within Nigeria’s judicial system.

In a statement released over the weekend in Abuja, it was highlighted that Nnamdi Kanu’s case serves as a stark illustration of the vulnerabilities within Nigeria’s legal and judicial systems when faced with the relentless pursuit of justice and self-determination.

The statement emphasised that the section of the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013, which the prosecution has relied upon, is no longer an active law in Nigeria.

It further argued that attempting to proceed under a repealed statute amounts to a violation of the long-standing doctrine of stare decisis, a principle that upholds the consistency and integrity of justice in common law systems.

He said, “Nigeria’s courts lack the substantive jurisdiction to try Kanu under a legal relic, and any attempt to do so constitutes a direct assault on his constitutional rights to a fair hearing and protection from retroactive punishment.

“The prosecution’s feeble reliance on Section 98(3) of the TPPA 2022—claiming continuity of proceedings—collapses under scrutiny. A de novo trial is a fresh proceeding, not an extension of a defunct case.

“The government’s legal acrobatics cannot mask this fundamental truth: the procedural jurisdiction to prosecute Kanu under the 2013 Act evaporated with its repeal. To persist is to invite ridicule and condemnation from both Nigerian citizens and the international community.”

Reports indicating that Nnamdi Kanu will take up his own defence on 21 March 2025 mark a pivotal moment in this unfolding saga. By successfully prompting the recusal of the prominent Justice Binta Nyako—despite institutional pushback—and securing the involvement of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Kanu has showcased his ability to challenge what he perceives, rightly or wrongly, as a prejudiced judicial system.

Kanu proceeds to represent self

If he proceeds to represent himself, the prosecution will encounter a formidable opponent equipped not only with sharp legal expertise but also the moral authority of a cause that resonates deeply with millions.

He said, “The twists and turns: Kanu’s self-representation will ignite legal fireworks, exposing the dirty underbelly of Nigeria’s judiciary—its inconsistencies, its biases, and its susceptibility to political manipulation. The government’s ability to control the narrative will crumble as Kanu commands the courtroom and the court of public opinion

“This is no ordinary case. It is the most consequential in Nigeria’s history, a crucible in which the judiciary’s credibility will be tested under unprecedented global scrutiny. Ordinary Nigerians, captivated by this drama, await the unraveling of legal arguments and the revelation of which laws the prosecution will twist to sustain its faltering case.

“Yet, the truth is inescapable: Nigeria cannot win. Convicting Kanu is a legal impossibility and a political miscalculation of historic proportions. His detention, his suffering, and his endurance for the Biafran cause have galvanized a movement that cannot be criminalized or intimidated into silence.

The statement urged Tinubu’s government to halt the planned prosecution and pursue an amicable resolution with Nnamdi Kanu before midnight on 20 March 2025. It warned that failure to do so could result in the exposure of corruption and systemic decay within Nigeria’s judicial system.

He said, “Political dissent cannot be extinguished by force, and the Biafran struggle will not be subdued by crackdowns or detention without trial.

“Kanu’s resolve is unshakable, and his platform on 21 March will amplify a truth the government cannot suppress: Nigeria’s judiciary lacks the authority and legitimacy to try him.”

Credit: Sahara Reporters

Ogugua

Recent Posts

10 Ukrainian interceptor drone factories have been built “behind the state’s back” – Zelenskyy

Ukrainian companies have built around 10 interceptor drone plants President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that…

2 days ago

2027: Atiku Hosts Musa Kwankwaso Amid Growing Opposition Alliance Talks

Atiku Abubakar and former Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso met in Abuja Former Vice-President…

4 days ago

ATIKU: OPL 245 concerns based on public records, not politics

insisting OPL 245 dispute is rooted in public records and legal processes Media office of…

5 days ago

Trump admin pitches 15-point peace proposal as Pakistan offers to hold talks

Iran rejects Trump 15-point peace proposal Iran has rejected a 15-point peace agreement put forward…

6 days ago

African bunkering hubs benefit as ships avoid Middle East routes

Ship-refuelling companies along Africa’s coastline enjoy a boost as ship avoid the Middle East Ship-refuelling…

1 week ago

BREAKING: Terrorists blow up bridge in Niger State

The incident, according to sources in the area, occurred Sunday evening, along the Wawa-Luma-Guffanti road…

1 week ago